PARTICIPANTS	29
SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS	30
Date of Establishment of the Webmaster Position	30
Centralized vs. Decentralized Website Governance Structure	30
Number of Individuals Allowed to Edit or Insert Content into the Website	30
Content-Orientation vs. IT-Orientation in How Webmasters View Their Role	31
College Department to which the Webmaster Reports	31
Sources that Fund the College Web Staff	31
Separate College Website Software Budget	32
College Spending on Website Consultants	32
Spending on Salaries for Web Staff	32
Percentage of Web Staff Represented by Union Labor Agreements	32
Who is Authorized to Enter Content to the Website?	33
The Institutional Catalysts for Instituting Changes to the Website	33
Number of Pages Actively Managed by the Webmaster	34
Management of Departmental Home Pages	34
Staffing the Central College Web Staff	34
Extent of Content Contributions to the Website from Various Academic and Administrative Units of the College	36
Number of Visits to the College Home Page	36
Use of Content Management Systems	37
Use of Style Guides for Web Submissions	37
Requirements to Conform to a Single Graphic Style	37
Provision of Web Page Templates	37
Frequency of Major Web Page Redesigns	37
Frequency of Review of Departmental or Divisional Websites by the College Webmaster	38
Website End User Training	38
Gaining Cooperation from End Users for New Website Initiatives	38
Policies on Allowing Postings of Research, Blogs & Special Projects	39
Use of Social Networking and other Popular Internet Sites	39
Use of Website Analytics Packages	40
Favored Server Platforms	41
Favored Scripting Languages	41
Favored Portal Software	41
Use of Personal Computers & Workstations by the Web Staff	41
Web Communications During A Campus Crisis	42
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE	43
Table A: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	43
Table B: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out by Type of College	43
Table C: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	43
SECTION #1:  DEGREE OF CENTRALIZATION OF WEBSITE CONTROL	44
Table #1-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster	44
Table #1-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	44
Table #1-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	44
Table #1-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	44
Table #1-5: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure	45
Table #1-6: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	45
Table #1-7: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out by Type of College	45
Table #1-8: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	45
Table #1-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester	46
Table #1-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	46
Table #1-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out by Type of College	46
Table #1-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	46
Table #1-13: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility	47
Table #1-14: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	47
Table #1-15: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out by Type of College	47
Table #1-16: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	47
Table #1-17: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports	47
Table #1-18: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	48
Table #1-19: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out by Type of College	48
Table #1-20: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	48
SECTION #2:  FUNDING THE COLLEGE WEB STAFF	49
Table #2-1: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration	49
Table #2-2: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	49
Table #2-3: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out by Type of College	49
Table #2-4: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	49
Table #2-5: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments	50
Table #2-6: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	50
Table #2-7: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College	50
Table #2-8: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	50
Table #2-9: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units	50
Table #2-10: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	51
Table #2-11: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out by Type of College	51
Table #2-12: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	51
Table #2-13: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees	51
Table #2-14: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	51
Table #2-15: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out by Type of College	52
Table #2-16: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	52
SECTION #3:  THE COLLEGE WEBSITE BUDGET	53
Table #3-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website (in $)	53
Table #3-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges (in $)	53
Table #3-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out by Type of College (in $)	53
Table #3-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	53
Table #3-5: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget	54
Table #3-6: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	54
Table #3-7: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out by Type of College	54
Table #3-8: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	54
SECTION #4:  SPENDING FOR WEBSITE STAFF & CONSULTANTS IN THE PAST YEAR	55
Table #4-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $)	55
Table #4-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	55
Table #4-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out by Type of College	55
Table #4-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	55
Table #4-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $)	56
Table #4-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	56
Table #4-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out by Type of College	56
Table #4-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	56
Table #4-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements	57
Table #4-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	57
Table #4-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out by Type of College	57
Table #4-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	57
SECTION #5:  INVESTMENT IN NEW WEB PROGRAMS	58
Table #5-1: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?	58
Table #5-2: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	58
Table #5-3: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out by Type of College	58
Table #5-4: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	58
Table #5-5: Percentage of Colleges that have Invested in New Development Software over the Past Three Years	58
Table #5-6: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years	59
Table #5-7: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	59
Table #5-8: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College	59
Table #5-9: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years	59
Table #5-10: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	59
Table #5-11: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College	60
Table #5-12: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	60
Table #5-13: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years	60
Table #5-14: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	60
Table #5-15: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College	60
Table #5-16: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	61
SECTION #6: WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER CONTENT TO THE WEBSITE WITHOUT PRIOR CLEARANCE FROM THE WEBMASTER?	62
Table #6-1: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	62
Table #6-2: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	62
Table #6-3: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	62
Table #6-4: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	63
Table #6-5: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	63
Table #6-6: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	63
Table #6-7: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	63
Table #6-8: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	64
Table #6-9: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	64
Table #6-10: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	64
Table #6-11: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	64
Table #6-12: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	65
Table #6-13: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	65
Table #6-14: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	65
Table #6-15: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	65
Table #6-16: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	66
Table #6-17: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster	66
Table #6-18: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	66
Table #6-19: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	66
Table #6-20: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	67
Table #6-21: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	67
Table #6-22: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	67
Table #6-23: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	67
Table #6-24: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	68
Table #6-25: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	68
Table #6-26: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service  to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	68
Table #6-27: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	68
Table #6-28: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	69
Table #6-29: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	69
Table #6-30: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	69
Table #6-31: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	69
Table #6-32: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	70
Table #6-33: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	70
Table #6-34: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	70
Table #6-35: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	70
Table #6-36: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	71
Table #6-37: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website	71
Table #6-38: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	71
Table #6-39: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	71
Table #6-40: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	71
Table #6-41: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster	72
Table #6-42: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	72
Table #6-43: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	72
Table #6-44: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	72
Table #6-45: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?	72
Table #6-46: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	73
Table #6-47: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out by Type of College	73
Table #6-48: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	73
SECTION #7:  INSTITUTIONAL CATALYSTS FOR CHANGING THE WEBSITE	74
Table #7-1: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website	74
Table #7-2: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	74
Table #7-3: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out by Type of College	74
Table #7-4: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	75
Table #7-5: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades	75
Table #7-6: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	75
Table #7-7: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out by Type of College	75
Table #7-8: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	76
SECTION #8:  NUMBER AND TYPE OF WEB PAGES MANAGED BY THE WEBMASTER & WEB STAFF	77
Table #8-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster	77
Table #8-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	77
Table #8-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College	77
Table #8-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	77
Table #8-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website	78
Table #8-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	78
Table #8-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	78
Table #8-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	78
Table #8-9: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page	79
Table #8-10: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	79
Table #8-11: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out by Type of College	79
Table #8-12: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	79
Table #8-13: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages	79
Table #8-14: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	80
Table #8-15: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	80
Table #8-16: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	80
Table #8-17: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages	80
Table #8-18: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	80
Table #8-19: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	81
Table #8-20: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	81
Table #8-21: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages	81
Table #8-22: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	81
Table #8-23: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	81
Table #8-24: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	82
Table #8-25: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages	82
Table #8-26: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	82
Table #8-27: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	82
Table #8-28: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	82
SECTION #9:  STAFFING THE COLLEGE WEBSITE	83
Table #9-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology	83
Table #9-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	83
Table #9-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out by Type of College	83
Table #9-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	83
Table #9-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content	84
Table #9-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	84
Table #9-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out by Type of College	84
Table #9-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	84
Table #9-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects	85
Table #9-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	85
Table #9-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out by Type of College	85
Table #9-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	85
Table #9-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers	86
Table #9-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	86
Table #9-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out by Type of College	86
Table #9-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	86
Table #9-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers	87
Table #9-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	87
Table #9-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out by Type of College	87
Table #9-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	87
Table #9-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers	88
Table #9-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	88
Table #9-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out by Type of College	88
Table #9-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	88
Table #9-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects	89
Table #9-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	89
Table #9-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out by Type of College	89
Table #9-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	89
Table #9-29: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors	90
Table #9-30: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	90
Table #9-31: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out by Type of College	90
Table #9-32: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	90
Table #9-33: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers	91
Table #9-34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	91
Table #9-35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Type of College	91
Table #9-36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	91
Table #9-37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	92
Table #9-38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrative Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators	92
Table #9-39: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	92
Table #9-40: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Type of College	92
Table #9-41: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	93
Table #9-42: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	93
Table #9-43: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators	93
Table #9-44: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	93
Table #9-45: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Type of College	94
Table #9-46: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	94
Table #9-47: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	94
Table #9-48: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers	94
Table #9-49: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	95
Table #9-50: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out by Type of College	95
Table #9-51: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	95
Table #9-52: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects	95
Table #9-53: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	95
Table #9-54: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out by Type of College	96
Table #9-55: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	96
Table #9-56: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff	96
Table #9-57: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	96
Table #9-58: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out by Type of College	97
Table  9-59: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	97
SECTION #10: QUANTITY OF CONTENT CONTRIBUTED TO THE COLLEGE WEBSITE BY VARIOUS SPECIFIC ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES	99
Table #10-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing	99
Table #10-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	99
Table #10-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Type of College	100
Table #10-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Type of College	100
Table #10-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	100
Table #10-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions	100
Table #10-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	101
Table #10-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out by Type of College	101
Table #10-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	101
Table #10-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments	101
Table #10-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	102
Table #10-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College	102
Table #10-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College	102
Table #10-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	102
Table #10-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited	103
Table #10-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	103
Table #10-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College	103
Table #10-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College	103
Table #10-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	104
Table #10-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations	104
Table #10-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	104
Table #10-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Type of College	104
Table #10-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Type of College	105
Table #10-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	105
SECTION #11:  STATISITCS ON WEB TRAFFIC TO THE COLLEGE WEBSITE	106
Table #11-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page	106
Table #11-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	106
Table #11-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out by Type of College	106
Table #11-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	106
Table #11-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page	107
Table #11-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	107
Table #11-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out by Type of College	107
Table #11-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	107
Table #11-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites	107
Table #11-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	108
Table #11-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Type of College	108
Table #11-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	108
Table #11-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites	108
Table #11-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	109
Table #11-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Type of College	109
Table #11-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	109
Table #11-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month	109
Table #11-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	110
Table #11-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out by Type of College	110
Table #11-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	110
Table #11-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year	110
Table #11-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	111
Table #11-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out by Type of College	111
Table #11-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	111
Table #11-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year	111
Table #11-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	111
Table #11-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out by Type of College	112
Table #11-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	112
SECTION #12:  USE OF CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS	113
Table #12-1: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages	113
Table #12-2: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	113
Table #12-3: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	113
Table #12-4: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	113
Table #12-5: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages	114
Table #12-6: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	114
Table #12-7: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College	114
Table #12-8: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	114
Table #12-9: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified	114
Table #12-10: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	115
Table #12-11: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	115
Table #12-12: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College	115
Table #12-13: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	115
Table #12-14: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?	115
Table #12-15: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	116
Table #12-16: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out by Type of College	116
Table #12-17: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	116
SECTION #13: DEGREE OF UNIFORMITY OF STYLE OF COLLEGE WEB PAGES	117
Table #13-1: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?	117
Table #13-2: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	117
Table #13-3: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out by Type of College	117
Table #13-4: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	117
Table #13-5: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?	117
Table #13-6: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	118
Table #13-7: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out by Type of College	118
Table #13-8: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	118
Table #13-9: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates	118
Table #13-10: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	118
Table #13-11: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out by Type of College	119
Table #13-12: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	119
SECTION #14:  DATE OF LAST MAJOR WEBSITE REDESIGN	120
Table #14-1: Date of Last Major Website Re-Design	120
Table #14-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	120
Table #14-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out by Type of College	120
Table #14-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	120
Table #14-5: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year	121
Table #14-6: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	121
Table #14-7: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out by Type of College	121
Table #14-8: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	121
Table #14-9: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website	121
Table #14-10: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	122
Table #14-11: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out by Type of College	122
Table #14-12: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	122
SECTION #15:  PROVIDING TRAINING TO END USERS OF THE WEBSITE	123
Table # 15-1: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?	123
Table #15-2: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	123
Table #15-3: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out by Type of College	123
Table #15-4: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	124
Table #15-5: Who Provides Training?	124
Table #15-6: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	124
Table #15-7: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out by Type of College	124
Table #15-8: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	124
Table #15-9: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives	125
Table #15-10: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	125
Table #15-11: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out by Type of College	125
Table #15-12: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	126
SECTION #16:    POLICIES ON ALLOWING FOR BLOGS AND OTHER VEHICLES FOR RANTS ON THE COLLEGE WEBSITE	127
Table #16-1: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research	127
Table #16-2: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	127
Table #16-3: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out by Type of College	127
Table #16-4: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	127
Table #16-5: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs	128
Table #16-6: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	128
Table #16-7: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College	128
Table #16-8: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	128
Table #16-9: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects	128
Table #16-10: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	129
Table #16-11: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out by Type of College	129
Table #16-12: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	129
Table #16-13: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs	129
Table #16-14: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	129
Table #16-15: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College	130
Table #16-16: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	130
Table #16-17: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs	130
Table #16-18: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	130
Table #16-19: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College	130
Table #16-20: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	131
Table #16-21: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons	131
Table #16-22: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	131
Table #16-23: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out by Type of College	131
Table #16-24: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	131
SECTION #17:   USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING AND OTHER MASS MARKET WEB SITES	132
Table #17-1: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website	132
Table #17-2: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	132
Table #17-3: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	132
Table #17-4: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	132
Table #17-5: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website	133
Table #17-6: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	133
Table #17-7: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	133
Table #17-8: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	133
Table #17-9: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website	133
Table #17-10: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website	134
Table #17-11: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	134
Table #17-12: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	134
Table #17-13: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	134
Table #17-14: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website	134
Table #17-15: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	135
Table #17-16: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	135
Table #17-17: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	135
Table #17-18: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website	135
Table #17-19: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website	135
Table #17-20: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	136
Table #17-21: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	136
Table #17-22: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	136
Table #17-23: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website	136
Table #17-24: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	136
Table #17-25: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	137
Table #17-26: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	137
Table #17-27: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website	137
Table #17-28: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	137
Table #17-29: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	137
Table #17-30: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	138
Table #17-31: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website	138
Table #17-32: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website	138
Table #17-33: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	138
Table #17-34: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	138
Table #17-35: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	139
Table #17-36: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website	139
Table #17-37: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	139
Table #17-38: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	139
Table #17-39: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	139
Table #17-40: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website	140
Table #17-41: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	140
Table #17-42: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	140
Table #17-43: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	140
SECTION #18:  USE OF WEBSITE ANALYTICS PACKAGES	141
Table #18-1: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?	141
Table #18-2: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	141
Table #18-3: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College	141
Table #18-4: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	141
Table #18-5: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?	141
Table #18-6: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	142
Table #18-7: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College	142
Table #18-8: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	142
Table #18-9: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?	142
Table #18-10: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	142
Table #18-11: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College	143
Table #18-12: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	143
Table #18-13: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?	143
Table #18-14: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	143
Table #18-15: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Type of College	143
Table #18-16: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	144
Table #18-17: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?	144
Table #18-18: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College	144
Table #18-19: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	144
Table #18-20: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc)	144
Table #18-21: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc), Broken Out by Type of College	145
Table #18-22: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	145
Table #18-23: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?	145
Table #18-24: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?, Broken Out by Type of College	145
Table #18-25: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	145
Table #18-26: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?	146
Table #18-27: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Type of College	146
Table #18-28: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	146
Table #18-29: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College	146
Table #18-30: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College, Broken Out by Type of College	146
Table #18-31: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	147
Table #18-32: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College	147
Table #18-33: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College, Broken Out by Type of College	147
Table #18-34: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	147
Table #18-35: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni	148
Table #18-36: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni, Broken Out by Type of College	148
Table #18-37: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	148
Table #18-38: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions	148
Table #18-39: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions, Broken Out by Type of College	148
Table #18-40: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	149
Table #18-41: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty	149
Table #18-42: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College	149
Table #18-43: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	149
Table #18-44: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College	150
Table #18-45: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College, Broken Out by Type of College	150
Table #18-46: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	150
SECTION #19:  SERVER PLATFORMS & OPERATING LANGUAGES	151
Table #19-1: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform	151
Table #19-2: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform, Broken Out by Type of College	151
Table #19-3: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	151
Table #19-4: What is the Primary Operating System?	151
Table #19-5: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	151
Table #19-6: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out by Type of College	152
Table #19-7: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	152
SECTION #20:  SUPPORT FOR VARIOUS SCRIPTING LANGUAGES	153
Table #20-1: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language	153
Table #20-2: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	153
Table #20-3: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	153
Table #20-4: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	153
Table #20-5: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language	153
Table #20-6: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	154
Table #20-7: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	154
Table #20-8: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	154
Table #20-9: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language	154
Table #20-10: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	154
Table #20-11: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	155
Table #20-12: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	155
Table #20-13: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language	155
Table #20-14: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	155
Table #20-15: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	155
Table #20-16: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	156
Table #20-17: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language	156
Table #20-18: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	156
Table #20-19: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	156
Table #20-20: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	156
Table #20-21: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language	157
Table #20-22: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	157
Table #20-23: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	157
Table #20-24: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	157
Table #20-25: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language	157
Table #20-26: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	157
Table #20-27: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College	158
Table #20-28: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP  as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	158
SECTION #21:  USE OF PORTAL & WEB DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE/APPLICATIONS	159
Table #21-1: Percentage of Websites that Use the Following Types of Portal Software	159
Table #21-2: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools	159
Table #21-3: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools	159
Table #21-4: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools, Broken Out by Type of College	159
Table #21-5: Percentage of Websites Using any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	160
Table #21-6: Percentage of Colleges that Use the Following Web Analytics Packages	160
SECTION #22:  DISASTER RECOVERY PLANS	161
SECTION #23: USE OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS & WORKSTATIONS BY THE COLLEGE WEBSITE STAFF	163
Table #23-1: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	163
Table #23-2: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	163
Table #23-3: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	163
Table #23-4: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	163
Table #23-5: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	163
Table #23-6: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	164
Table #23-7: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	164
Table #23-8: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	164
Table #23-9: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	164
Table #23-10: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	164
Table #23-11: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	165
Table #23-12: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	165
Table #23-13: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	165
Table #23-14: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	165
Table #23-15: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	165
Table #23-16: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	166
Table #23-17: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	166
Table #23-18: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	166
Table #23-19: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	166
Table #23-20: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	166
Table #23-21: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations	167
Table #23-22: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	167
Table #23-23: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College	167
Table #23-24: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	167
SECTION #24:  ROLE OF THE WEBSITE IN CAMPUS CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY	168
Table #24-1: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast	168
Table #24-2: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	168
Table #24-3: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out by Type of College	168
Table #24-4: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	168
Table #24-5: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website	169
Table #24-6: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	169
Table #24-7: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College	169
Table #24-8: Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	169
Table #24-9: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones	169
Table 24-10: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges	170
Table 24-11: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Type of College	170
Table 24-12: Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment	170
OTHER REPORTS OF INTEREST FROM PRIMARY RESEARCH GROUP	171

 
PARTICIPANTS



 
The University of Texas Health Science Center
Douglas College
University of Wisconsin-Parkside
Texas Lutheran University
SAIT Polytechnic
Lynchburg College
Penn State
Griffith University
Jacksonville University
Texas State University
University of Texas Health Science Center at 
San Antonio
SUNY Plattsburgh
Carthage College
Cape Fear Community College
Tusculum College
The Art Institute of Pittsburgh
Northwestern Oklahoma State University 
Ohio Northern University
Arcadia University
SUNY Oneonta 
California Institute of Technology
Ramapo College of New Jersey
Lewis University
Ithaca College
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Benedictine University
Wentworth Institute of Technology
Southern Illinois University 
Bowdoin College
Oklahoma Baptist University
Montana State University
Drake University
Union University
Marquette University
University of Ottawa
University of Pittsburgh at Bradford
Ursuline College
Loyola University Chicago
Fairleigh Dickinson University
University of the Incarnate Word
TMCC
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Goucher College
Augusta State University
Southern Arkansas University
Marywood University
Southwest Tennessee Community College
Monash University
State University of New York College at Brockport
Illinois Central College 
College of Education and Human Development, University
of Minnesota
Mount Mercy College
Jacksonville University
Mercyhurst College
Eastern Iowa Community College District
Angelo State University 
Florida Gulf Coast University
University of Texas-Pan American
Amarillo College
Davenport University
Oregon State University
Bethany Lutheran College
Merrimack College
Pomona College 
Morningside College
Calvin College
Portland Community College
Rowan University
William Woods University 
 

Back

© Primary Research Group