 |
 |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables 3
SELECT PARTICIPANTS 21
1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE 22
2. SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS 24
Contents of the Digital Repository 24
Cost of Developing the Repository 25
Software Procured for Operating the Digital Repository 25
In-House vs. Open Access to the Digital Repository 25
Mean Founding Date of the Digital Repository 26
Use of Content from Pre-Existing Divisional or Departmental Repositories 26
Types and Brands of Software Used to Operate the Digital Repository 26
Number of Man Hours of Labor Per Year Needed to Operate the Digital Repository 26
Purchasing Plans for Repository Software 26
eNewsletters or RSS feeds to Publicize the Repository 27
Website Links to Publicize the Repository 27
Use of Blogs, Brochures and Annual Reports to Publicize the Repository 27
Number of End Users of the Repository 28
Downloads from the Digital Repository 28
Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository 28
Digital Repository Budgets 29
Institutional Source of the Labor Required to Operate the Digital Repository 29
Percentage of Published Works Written by the College/Institutions Authors Archived in the Digital Repository 29
Which Departments Contribute To The Digital Repository? 30
Number of Books, Journal Articles, Articles from Non-Refereed Publications, and Digital Images Held by the Digital Repository 31
Percentage of Books That Are Full Open Access 32
Percentage of Books Subject to Page View Limits 32
Percentage of Repositories that Share Content with Google Books or other Search Engine Book Sites 33
Financial Impact of the Digital Repository on the Sponsoring Institution 33
Sources of Funding for the Digital Repository 33
3. CONTENTS OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 34
4. INITIAL REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING 43
5. SOFTWARE AND WEB APPLICATIONS FOR THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 50
6. MARKETING THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 58
7. NUMBER OF VISITORS TO AND END USERS OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 64
8. THE BUDGET OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 68
9. WHO WORKS IN AND RUNS THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY? 69
10. FACULTY & INSTITUTIONAL ADMINISTRATION COOPERATION WITH THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 74
11. DEGREE OF OPEN ACCESS TO THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 97
12. RELATIONS WITH SEARCH ENGINES 111
13. FUNDING THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY 115
14. CATALOGING ISSUES 121
OTHER REPORTS FROM PRIMARY RESEARCH GROUP 123
List of Tables
Table 11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms 22
Table 12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 22
Table 13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by the Country or Region of Location of the Repository 22
Table 14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 23
Table 31: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Books Written by Faculty 34
Table 32: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Books Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 34
Table 33: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty 34
Table 34: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 34
Table 35: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 35
Table 36: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 35
Table 37: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty 35
Table 38: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 35
Table 39: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 35
Table 310: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 36
Table 311: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images 36
Table 312: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 36
Table 313: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 36
Table 314: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 36
Table 315: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses 37
Table 316: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or These, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 37
Table 317: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 37
Table 318: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 37
Table 319: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework 37
Table 320: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 38
Table 321: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 38
Table 322: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 38
Table 323: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records 38
Table 324: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 38
Table 325: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 39
Table 326: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 39
Table 327: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents 39
Table 328: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 39
Table 329: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 39
Table 330: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 40
Table 331: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine 40
Table 332: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 40
Table 333: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 40
Table 334: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 40
Table 335: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University 41
Table 336: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 41
Table 337: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 41
Table 338: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 41
Table 339: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College 41
Table 340: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 42
Table 341: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 42
Table 342: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 42
Table 41: Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$) 43
Table 42: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$)*, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 43
Table 43: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$)*, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 43
Table 44: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository 43
Table 45: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 44
Table 46: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 44
Table 47: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 44
Table 48: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 44
Table 49: Repository Access Restriction Policies 44
Table 410: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 45
Table 411: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 45
Table 412: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 45
Table 413: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository 45
Table 414: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 46
Table 415: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 46
Table 416: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 46
Table 417: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation 46
Table 418: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 47
Table 419: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 47
Table 420: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 47
Table 421: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments 48
Table 422: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 48
Table 423: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 48
Table 424: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 49
Table 51: Percentage of Libraries that Use CDWare 50
Table 52: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons 50
Table 53: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 50
Table 54: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 50
Table 55: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 50
Table 56: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Media Archives 51
Table 57: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool 51
Table 58: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 51
Table 59: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 51
Table 510: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 51
Table 511: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DoKS SOftware 52
Table 512: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software 52
Table 513: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 52
Table 514: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 52
Table 515: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 52
Table 516: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software 53
Table 517: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 53
Table 518: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 53
Table 519: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 53
Table 520: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Symposia Software 53
Table 521: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora 53
Table 522: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 54
Table 523: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 54
Table 524: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 54
Table 525: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified 54
Table 526: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 54
Table 527: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 55
Table 528: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 55
Table 529: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years? 55
Table 530: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years? Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 55
Table 531: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 56
Table 532: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years? Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 56
Table 61: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository 58
Table 62: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 58
Table 63: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 58
Table 64: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 58
Table 65: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website 59
Table 66: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 59
Table 67: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 59
Table 68: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 59
Table 69: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website* 59
Table 610: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 60
Table 611: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 60
Table 612: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 60
Table 613: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository 60
Table 614: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 60
Table 615: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Bog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 61
Table 616: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 61
Table 617: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository 61
Table 618: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 61
Table 619: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 61
Table 620: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 62
Table 621: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository 62
Table 622: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 62
Table 623: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 62
Table 624: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 62
Table 6-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US) 63
Table 6-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), , Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 63
Table 6-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 63
Table 6-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 63
Table 71: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year 64
Table 72: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 64
Table 73: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 64
Table 74: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 65
Table 75: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution 65
Table 76: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 65
Table 77: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 66
Table 78: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository 66
Table 79: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 66
Table 710: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 66
Table 711: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository 67
Table 712: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 67
Table 713: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 67
Table 81: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library (in $ US) 68
Table 82: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository (in $ US) 68
Table 83: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository (in $ US) 68
Table 91: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Library Personnel 69
Table 92: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Library Personnel, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 69
Table 93: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byLibrary Personnel, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 69
Table 94: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by the Library, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 70
Table 95: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library 70
Table 96: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 70
Table 97: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byAcademic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 70
Table 98: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 71
Table 99: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments 71
Table 910: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 71
Table 911: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 71
Table 912: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 72
Table 913: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Other Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified 72
Table 914: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byOther Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 72
Table 915: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Other Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 73
Table 916: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byOther Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 73
Table 101: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository 74
Table 102: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 74
Table 103: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 74
Table 104: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 75
Table 105: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository 75
Table 106: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 75
Table 107: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 75
Table 108: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institutions Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 76
Table 109: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences 76
Table 1010: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 76
Table 1011: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 76
Table 1012: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 77
Table 1013: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry 77
Table 1014: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 77
Table 1015: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 77
Table 1016: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 78
Table 1017: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics 78
Table 1018: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 78
Table 1019: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 78
Table 1020: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 79
Table 1021: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature 79
Table 1022: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 79
Table 1023: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 79
Table 1024: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 80
Table 1025: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music 80
Table 1026: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 80
Table 1027: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 81
Table 1028: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 81
Table 1029: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics 81
Table 1030: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 81
Table 1031: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 82
Table 1032: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 82
Table 1033: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology 82
Table 1034: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 82
Table 1035: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 83
Table 1036: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 83
Table 1037: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology 84
Table 1038: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 84
Table 1039: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 84
Table 1040: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 84
Table 1041: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law 85
Table 1042: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 85
Table 1043: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 85
Table 1044: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 85
Table 1045: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams 86
Table 1046: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 86
Table 1047: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 86
Table 1048: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 86
Table 1049: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums 87
Table 1050: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 87
Table 1051: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 87
Table 1052: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 87
Table 1053: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution 88
Table 1054: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 88
Table 1055: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 88
Table 1056: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 88
Table 1057: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement 89
Table 1058: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 89
Table 1059: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 89
Table 1060: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 90
Table 1061: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office 90
Table 1062: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 90
Table 1063: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 91
Table 1064: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 91
Table 1065: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office 91
Table 1066: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 91
Table 1067: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 92
Table 1068: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 92
Table 1069: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper 92
Table 1070: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 92
Table 1071: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 93
Table 1072: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 93
Table 111: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository 97
Table 112: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 97
Table 113: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 97
Table 114: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 98
Table 115: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository 98
Table 116: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 98
Table 117: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 98
Table 118: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 99
Table 119: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines 99
Table 1110: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 99
Table 1111: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 99
Table 1112: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 100
Table 1113: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository 100
Table 1114: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 100
Table 1115: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 100
Table 1116: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 101
Table 1117: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication 101
Table 1118: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 101
Table 1119: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 101
Table 1120: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 102
Table 1121: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less 102
Table 1122: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 102
Table 1123: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 103
Table 1124: Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 103
Table 1125: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year 103
Table 1126: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 104
Table 1127: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year , Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 104
Table 1128: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 104
Table 1129: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access 105
Table 1130: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 105
Table 1131: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 105
Table 1132: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 106
Table 1133: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits 106
Table 1134: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 106
Table 1135: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 107
Table 1136: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions 107
Table 1137: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 108
Table 1138: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 108
Table 1139: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access 108
Table 1140: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 109
Table 1141: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Subjected to a Page View Limit 109
Table 1142: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Subjected to a Page View Limit, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 109
Table 1143: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to an Institution or Set of Institutions 109
Table 1144: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to an Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 110
Table 121: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books 111
Table 122: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 111
Table 123: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 111
Table 124: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 111
Table 125: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo 112
Table 126: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 112
Table 127: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 112
Table 128: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 112
Table 129: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN 112
Table 1210: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 113
Table 1211: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 113
Table 1212: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 113
Table 1213: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited 113
Table 1214: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 113
Table 1215: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 114
Table 1216: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 114
Table 13- 1: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository 115
Table 13- 2: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 115
Table 13- 3: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to perate the Digital Repository 116
Table 13- 4: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 116
Table 13- 5: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository 116
Table 13- 6: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 117
Table 13- 7: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 117
Table 13- 8: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 117
Table 13- 9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Spending of Grant Money by the Repository, Subset of Institutions that Receive Grant Money for the Repository, in $US 117
Table 13- 10: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work 118
Table 13- 11: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 118
Table 13- 12: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 118
Table 13- 13: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 118
Table 13- 14: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work 118
Table 13- 15: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 119
Table 13- 16: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 119
Table 13- 17: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 119
Table 13- 18: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work 119
Table 13- 19: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 119
Table 13- 20: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 120
Table 13- 21: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 120
Table14- 1: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository 121
Table14- 2: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository 121
Table14- 3: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository 121
Table14- 4: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository 122
SELECT PARTICIPANTS
BYU
Western Kentucky University
Ferris State University
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
University of Virginia Library
International Center of Photography
Oklahoma State University Library
University of Birmingham
Rijks Instituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
University of Waikato
Houston Academy of Medicine-Texas Medical Center Library
JISC
Stockholm University Library
Oregon State University Libraries
University of Leicester
National Law School of India University
Free Library of Philadelphia
Macalester College
Biddle Law Library, U Penn Law School
Vanderbilt University Library
Northeastern University
Leiden University Library
OECD -- Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development (International Organization)
University of South Australia Library
Raman Research Institute
University of South Australia
University of Southern Queensland
University of Namibia Library
National Institute of Public Finance and Policy
Unitec Institute of Technology
University of Waterloo
The Libraries of the Claremont Colleges
University of Pennsylvania
Universidad Nacional Autσnoma de Mιxico
Illinois State Geological Survey
University of Wisconsin
Central Queensland University
University of London (The Bloomsbury Colleges Consortium)
New Mexico State Library
University of Wisconsin-River Falls
Fondren Library, Rice University
School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton
UKOLN (Library research organization based at the University of Bath, UK)
University of Hull
University of Botswana
Tarleton State University
Queensland University of Technology (Australia)
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Florida International University
RWTH Aachen (Germany)
DRDO (Defense Research & Development Organization/Government of India)
Humboldt-Universitδt zu Berlin
IFREMER (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea)
Back
© Primary Research Group 
