PARTICIPANTS

 
Allegany College of Maryland
Anna Maria College
Art Insitute of Vancouver
Art Institute of California - Los Angeles
Art Institute of Pittsburgh
Beaman Library, Lipscomb University
Benedictine University
Caltech
Central Community College - Grand Island 
     Campus
Clark State Community College
Clark University
Clarke College
Clemson University
Colgate University
College of Mount St. Joseph
College of the Redwoods
Dacus Library, Winthrop University
Eckerd College
Fashion Institute of Design and 
     Merchandising
Flint Hills Technical College
Florida Southern College
Gainesville State College
Gingrich Library, Albright College
Glendale Community College
Hewes Library Monmouth College
Hillsdale College, Mossey Library
Hollins University
Hood College, Beneficial Hodson Library
ITT Technical Institute--Charlotte
Jackson State Community College Library
Johnson County Community College
Kettering College of Medical Arts
Lambuth University
Virginia Tech
Louis J. Blume Library, St. Mary's University
Melick Library, Eureka College
Messiah College
Meyer Library, Missouri State University
Millsaps College Library
Milwaukee Area Technical College
Moravian College
Mount Saint Mary College
Nazareth College
NCSU Libraries, No. Carolina State University
Nebraska Wesleyan University
North Carolina State University
Northampton Community College
Northcentral Technical College
Northwest Christian University
Northwestern College, St. Paul, MN
Oakland Community College
Oral Roberts University
Rider University
Rolfing Library, Trinity International 
     University
Saginaw Valley State University
Saint Cloud State University
Saint Mary's College
Sam Houston State University
Simon Fraser University
South University
Taft College Library
Texas State University-San Marcos
UMass Dartmouth
UMW
University of Akron
University of Idaho
University of Kansas
University of Nebraska at Kearney
University of North Dakota
University of Tampa
University of Tennessee
University of Texas at San Antonio
University of West Georgia
VC/UHV Library
Wesleyan University
Western Oregon University
Wilkens Library | Cape Cod Community 
     College

CREDITS

Questionnaire Designer for this Report:

Elaine Sanchez, Head, Cataloging & Metadata Service, Texas State University, San Marcos 



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARTICIPANTS	2
TABLE OF CONTENTS	3
Summary of Main Findings	39
Prior Experience as a Hiring Criterion	39
Use of Professional and Paraprofessional Staff for Various Cataloging-Related Tasks	40
Gains & Losses in the Number of Cataloging Positions	42
Appealing for Cataloging Budgetary Support from Library Administration	43
Work Rate Completion	43
Use of Cataloging Quality Indicators	44
Outsourcing of Cataloging Functions	44
Reviewing and Editing Records	45
Cataloging Conference Attendance and Use of Continuing Education in Cataloging	45
Rating the Current State of Cataloging Training	46
Rating the Preparedness of New Academic Library Hires in Cataloging	47
Chapter 1: Personnel Issues	49
Chapter 2: Salary Issues	113
Chapter 3: Work Rate Completion	119
Chapter 4: Technology	142
Chapter 5: Outsourcing	151
Chapter 6: Conference Attendance	175
Chapter 7: State of Cataloging Education in Library Schools	214

List of Tables

TABLE 1.1:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EVIDENCE OF LEADERSHIP IN A LIBRARY SETTING	65
TABLE 1.2:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EVIDENCE OF LEADERSHIP IN A LIBRARY SETTING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	65
TABLE 1.3:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EVIDENCE OF LEADERSHIP IN A LIBRARY SETTING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	66
TABLE 1.4:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EVIDENCE OF LEADERSHIP IN A LIBRARY SETTING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	66
TABLE 1.5:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: PRIOR PROFESSIONAL CATALOGING EXPERIENCE	66
TABLE 1.6:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: PRIOR PROFESSIONAL CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	66
TABLE 1.7:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: PRIOR PROFESSIONAL CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	67
TABLE 1.8:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: PRIOR PROFESSIONAL CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	67
TABLE 1.9:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH IMPLEMENTING NEW TECHNOLOGIES (CATALOGING OR OTHER)	67
TABLE 1.10:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH IMPLEMENTING NEW TECHNOLOGIES (CATALOGING OR OTHER), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	67
TABLE 1.11:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH IMPLEMENTING NEW TECHNOLOGIES (CATALOGING OR OTHER), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	68
TABLE 1.12:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH IMPLEMENTING NEW TECHNOLOGIES (CATALOGING OR OTHER), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	68
TABLE 1.13:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OCLC	68
TABLE 1.14:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	68
TABLE 1.15:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	69
TABLE 1.16:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………..69
TABLE 1.17:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN USE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………..69
TABLE 1.18:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	69
TABLE 1.19:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	70
TABLE 1.20:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	70
TABLE 1.21:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH AN INTEGRATED ONLINE SYSTEM	……………………………………………………………………………………………………..70
TABLE 1.22:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH AN INTEGRATED ONLINE SYSTEM, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	70
TABLE 1.23:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH AN INTEGRATED ONLINE SYSTEM, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	71
TABLE 1.24:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH AN INTEGRATED ONLINE SYSTEM, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	71
TABLE 1.25:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: DEMONSTRATION OF TEAMWORK	71
TABLE 1.26:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: DEMONSTRATION OF TEAMWORK, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	71
TABLE 1.27:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: DEMONSTRATION OF TEAMWORK, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	72
TABLE 1.28:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: DEMONSTRATION OF TEAMWORK, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	72
TABLE 1.29:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AUTHORITY CONTROL EXPERIENCE	72
TABLE 1.30:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AUTHORITY CONTROL EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	72
TABLE 1.31:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AUTHORITY CONTROL EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	73
TABLE 1.32:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AUTHORITY CONTROL EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	73
TABLE 1.33:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH THE FORMULATION AND CREATION OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES	73
TABLE 1.34:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH THE FORMULATION AND CREATION OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	73
TABLE 1.35:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH THE FORMULATION AND CREATION OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	74
TABLE 1.36:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH THE FORMULATION AND CREATION OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	74
TABLE 1.37:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT THESAURUS SYSTEM IN USE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………..74
TABLE 1.38:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT THESAURUS SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	75
TABLE 1.39:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT THESAURUS SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	75
TABLE 1.40:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT THESAURUS SYSTEM IN USE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	75
TABLE 1.41:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A 
CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: TRAINING OR TEACHING EXPERIENCE	76
TABLE 1.42:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: TRAINING OR TEACHING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	76
TABLE 1.43:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: TRAINING OR TEACHING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	76
TABLE 1.44:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: TRAINING OR TEACHING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	76
TABLE 1.45:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD VERBAL COMMUNICATION	77
TABLE 1.46:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD VERBAL COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	77
TABLE 1.47:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD VERBAL COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	77
TABLE 1.48:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD VERBAL COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	77
TABLE 1.49:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH MARC STANDARDS	78
TABLE 1.50:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH MARC STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	78
TABLE 1.51:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH MARC STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	78
TABLE 1.52:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH MARC STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	78
TABLE 1.53:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AACR2 CATALOGING EXPERIENCE	79
TABLE 1.54:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AACR2 CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	79
TABLE 1.55:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AACR2 CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	79
TABLE 1.56:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: AACR2 CATALOGING EXPERIENCE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	79
TABLE 1.57:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: STRONG INTERPERSONAL AND COLLABORATIVE SKILLS	                                                                                                                                                          80
TABLE 1.58:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: STRONG INTERPERSONAL AND COLLABORATIVE SKILLS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	80
TABLE 1.59:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: STRONG INTERPERSONAL AND COLLABORATIVE SKILLS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	80
TABLE 1.60:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: STRONG INTERPERSONAL AND COLLABORATIVE SKILLS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	80
TABLE 1.61:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS	81
TABLE 1.62:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	81
TABLE 1.63:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	81
TABLE 1.64:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	81
TABLE 1.65:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS	82
TABLE 1.66:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	82
TABLE 1.67:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	82
TABLE 1.68:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOWLEDGE OF METADATA STANDARDS, SUCH AS DUBLIN CORE, AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	82
TABLE 1.69:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD WRITING SKILLS	83
TABLE 1.70:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD WRITING SKILLS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	83
TABLE 1.71:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD WRITING SKILLS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	83
TABLE 1.72:	RANKING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTIC AS A CRITERION FOR HIRING A CATALOGER: GOOD WRITING SKILLS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                          83
TABLE 1.73:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL STAFF FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING	84
TABLE 1.74:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL STAFF FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	84
TABLE 1.75:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL STAFF FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	84
TABLE 1.76:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL STAFF FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                          84
TABLE 1.77:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING	84
TABLE 1.78:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	85
TABLE 1.79:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	85
TABLE 1.80:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ORIGINAL CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                          85
TABLE 1.81:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR COPY CATALOGING	85
TABLE 1.82:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	85
TABLE 1.83:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	86
TABLE 1.84:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                          86
TABLE 1.85:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR COPY CATALOGING	86
TABLE 1.86:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	86
TABLE 1.87:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	86
TABLE 1.88:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR COPY CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	87
TABLE 1.89:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO)   ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….87
TABLE 1.90:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	87
TABLE 1.91:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	87
TABLE 1.92:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	88
TABLE 1.93:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO)	88
TABLE 1.94:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	88
TABLE 1.95:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	88
TABLE 1.96:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR NAME AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (NACO), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	89
TABLE 1.97:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO)	                                                                                                                                                          89
TABLE 1.98:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	89
TABLE 1.99:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	89
TABLE 1.100:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	90
TABLE 1.101:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO)	90
TABLE 1.102:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	90
TABLE 1.103:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	90
TABLE 1.104:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE WORK (SACO), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	91
TABLE 1.105:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC	91
TABLE 1.106:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	91
TABLE 1.107:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	91
TABLE 1.108:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	92
TABLE 1.109:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC	                                                                                                                                                     92
TABLE 1.110:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	92
TABLE 1.111:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	92
TABLE 1.112:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENHANCEMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	93
TABLE 1.113:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR PARTICIPATION IN PCC, CONSER AND BIBCO 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD WORK	93
TABLE 1.114:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR PARTICIPATION IN PCC, CONSER AND BIBCO 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD WORK	93
TABLE 1.115:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR PARTICIPATION IN PCC, CONSER AND BIBCO 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD WORK, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	93
TABLE 1.116:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR PARTICIPATION IN PCC, CONSER AND BIBCO 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD WORK, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	93
TABLE 1.117:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR PARTICIPATION IN PCC, CONSER AND BIBCO 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD WORK, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	94
TABLE 1.118:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC	                                                                                                                                                     94
TABLE 1.119:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	94
TABLE 1.120:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	94
TABLE 1.121:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	95
TABLE 1.122:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC	95
TABLE 1.123:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	95
TABLE 1.124:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	95
TABLE 1.125:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ENRICHMENT IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	96
TABLE 1.126:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION	96
TABLE 1.127:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	96
TABLE 1.128:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	96
TABLE 1.129:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	97
TABLE 1.130:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION	………………………………………………………………………………………………….97
TABLE 1.131:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	97
TABLE 1.132:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	97
TABLE 1.133:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR SUBJECT ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT HEADING APPLICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	98
TABLE 1.134:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR CLASSIFICATION	98
TABLE 1.135:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	98
TABLE 1.136:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	98
TABLE 1.137:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                     99
TABLE 1.138:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR CLASSIFICATION	99
TABLE 1.139:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	                                                                                                                                                     99
TABLE 1.140:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	99
TABLE 1.141:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR CLASSIFICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	99
TABLE 1.142:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC	                                                                                                                                                     100
TABLE 1.143:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	100
TABLE 1.144:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	100
TABLE 1.145:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	100
TABLE 1.146:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC	100
TABLE 1.147:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	101
TABLE 1.148:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	101
TABLE 1.149:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD UPGRADES IN OCLC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	101
TABLE 1.150:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	101
TABLE 1.151:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	                                                                                                                                                     101
TABLE 1.152:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	102
TABLE 1.153:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	102
TABLE 1.154:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	102
TABLE 1.155:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	           ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….102
TABLE 1.156:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	103
TABLE 1.157:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SERIES, UNIFORM TITLE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	103
TABLE 1.158:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	103
TABLE 1.159:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	103
TABLE 1.160:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	104
TABLE 1.161:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                     104
TABLE 1.162:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	104
TABLE 1.163:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	104
TABLE 1.164:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	105
TABLE 1.165:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL NAME, CORPORATE BODY, AND CONFERENCE HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                     105
TABLE 1.166:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	105
TABLE 1.167:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	105
TABLE 1.168:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	106
TABLE 1.169:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	106
TABLE 1.170:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS	106
TABLE 1.171:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	   ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….106
TABLE 1.172:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	106
TABLE 1.173:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT ROUTINELY USE PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL SUBJECT AND GEOGRAPHIC HEADINGS AND AUTHORITY RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	107
TABLE 1.174:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CATALOGING LIBRARY SUPPORT STAFF GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS	107
TABLE 1.175:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CATALOGING LIBRARY SUPPORT STAFF GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	107
TABLE 1.176:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CATALOGING LIBRARY SUPPORT STAFF GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	107
TABLE 1.177:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CATALOGING LIBRARY SUPPORT STAFF GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	108
TABLE 1.178:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS IN CATALOGING FUNCTIONS GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS	108
TABLE 1.179:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS IN CATALOGING FUNCTIONS GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	108
TABLE 1.180:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS IN CATALOGING FUNCTIONS GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	108
TABLE 1.181:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POSITIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS IN CATALOGING FUNCTIONS GAINED OR LOST IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	109
TABLE 1.182:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE CATALOGING AGENCIES PARTICIPATE IN LIBRARY SCHOOL STUDENT MENTORING OR INTERNSHIPS, OR THE RECRUITMENT OF EXISTING STAFF AND STUDENT WORKERS INTO THE CATALOGING PROFESSION	109
TABLE 1.183:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE CATALOGING AGENCIES PARTICIPATE IN LIBRARY SCHOOL STUDENT MENTORING OR INTERNSHIPS, OR THE RECRUITMENT OF EXISTING STAFF AND STUDENT WORKERS INTO THE CATALOGING PROFESSION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	109
TABLE 1.184:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE CATALOGING AGENCIES PARTICIPATE IN LIBRARY SCHOOL STUDENT MENTORING OR INTERNSHIPS, OR THE RECRUITMENT OF EXISTING STAFF AND STUDENT WORKERS INTO THE CATALOGING PROFESSION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	109
TABLE 1.185:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE CATALOGING AGENCIES PARTICIPATE IN LIBRARY SCHOOL STUDENT MENTORING OR INTERNSHIPS, OR THE RECRUITMENT OF EXISTING STAFF AND STUDENT WORKERS INTO THE CATALOGING PROFESSION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	110
TABLE 1.186:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS	110
TABLE 1.187:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	                                                                                                                                                   110
TABLE 1.188:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	110
TABLE 1.189:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	111
TABLE 1.190:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS	111
TABLE 1.191:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	111
TABLE 1.192:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	111
TABLE 1.193:	MEAN, MEDIAN, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARAPROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMING MOSTLY CATALOGING FUNCTIONS RETIRING FROM YOUR INSTITUTION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	112

TABLE 2.1:	DO CATALOGERS AT YOUR INSTITUTION HAVE SALARIES COMPARABLE TO PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIANS?	113
TABLE 2.2:	PERCENTAGE OF CATALOGERS AT YOUR INSTITUTION WITH SALARIES COMPARABLE TO PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIANS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	113
TABLE 2.3:	PERCENTAGE OF CATALOGERS AT YOUR INSTITUTION WITH SALARIES COMPARABLE TO PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIANS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	113
TABLE 2.4:	PERCENTAGE OF CATALOGERS AT YOUR INSTITUTION WITH SALARIES COMPARABLE TO PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIANS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	113
TABLE 2.5:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING A VISION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXCELLENCE TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS	114
TABLE 2.6:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING A VISION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXCELLENCE TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	114
TABLE 2.7:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING A VISION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXCELLENCE TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	114
TABLE 2.8:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING A VISION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXCELLENCE TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	114
TABLE 2.9:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AND WORK PRODUCTS TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS	115
TABLE 2.10:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AND WORK PRODUCTS TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	115
TABLE 2.11:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AND WORK PRODUCTS TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	115
TABLE 2.12:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AND WORK PRODUCTS TO LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	115
TABLE 2.13:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL WORKFLOWS THAT PROMOTE SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND INTEGRATION	116
TABLE 2.14:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL WORKFLOWS THAT PROMOTE SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND INTEGRATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	116
TABLE 2.15:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL WORKFLOWS THAT PROMOTE SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND INTEGRATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	116
TABLE 2.16:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: CREATING AND ARTICULATING NEW DEPARTMENTAL WORKFLOWS THAT PROMOTE SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND INTEGRATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	116
TABLE 2.17:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: MARKETING AND BRANDING CATALOGING AND METADATA SERVICES AND PERSONNEL VIA OUTREACH, NEWSLETTERS, PRESENTATIONS	117
TABLE 2.18:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: MARKETING AND BRANDING CATALOGING AND METADATA SERVICES AND PERSONNEL VIA OUTREACH, NEWSLETTERS, PRESENTATIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	117
TABLE 2.19:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: MARKETING AND BRANDING CATALOGING AND METADATA SERVICES AND PERSONNEL VIA OUTREACH, NEWSLETTERS, PRESENTATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	117
TABLE 2.20:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY THE FOLLOWING METHOD IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT: MARKETING AND BRANDING CATALOGING AND METADATA SERVICES AND PERSONNEL VIA OUTREACH, NEWSLETTERS, PRESENTATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	117
TABLE 2.21:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY NONE OF THE METHODS PREVIOUSLY CITED IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT	 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...118
TABLE 2.22:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY NONE OF THE METHODS PREVIOUSLY CITED IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	118
TABLE 2.23:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY NONE OF THE METHODS PREVIOUSLY CITED IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	118
TABLE 2.24:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT EMPLOY NONE OF THE METHODS PREVIOUSLY CITED IN ADVOCATING FOR BUDGETARY AND STAFFING SUPPORT, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	118

TABLE 3.1:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE TECHNICAL SERVICES AREA TRACKS TURNAROUND TIME FROM ACQUISITIONS RECEIPT TO CATALOGING TO SHELF-READY DISTRIBUTION	123
TABLE 3.2:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE TECHNICAL SERVICES AREA TRACKS TURNAROUND TIME FROM ACQUISITIONS RECEIPT TO CATALOGING TO SHELF-READY DISTRIBUTION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	123
TABLE 3.3:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE TECHNICAL SERVICES AREA TRACKS TURNAROUND TIME FROM ACQUISITIONS RECEIPT TO CATALOGING TO SHELF-READY DISTRIBUTION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	123
TABLE 3.4:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE WHOSE TECHNICAL SERVICES AREA TRACKS TURNAROUND TIME FROM ACQUISITIONS RECEIPT TO CATALOGING TO SHELF-READY DISTRIBUTION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	124
TABLE 3.5:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: CATALOGER OR STAFF WORK PRODUCT QUOTAS	124
TABLE 3.6:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: CATALOGER OR STAFF WORK PRODUCT QUOTAS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	124
TABLE 3.7:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: CATALOGER OR STAFF WORK PRODUCT QUOTAS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	124
TABLE 3.8:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: CATALOGER OR STAFF WORK PRODUCT QUOTAS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	125
TABLE 3.9:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: TURNAROUND TIME FROM RECEIPT IN CATALOGING TO READY FOR SHELF	125
TABLE 3.10:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: TURNAROUND TIME FROM RECEIPT IN CATALOGING TO READY FOR SHELF, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	125
TABLE 3.11:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: TURNAROUND TIME FROM RECEIPT IN CATALOGING TO READY FOR SHELF, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	125
TABLE 3.12:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: TURNAROUND TIME FROM RECEIPT IN CATALOGING TO READY FOR SHELF, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	126
TABLE 3.13:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: ERROR RATES PER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD	126
TABLE 3.14:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: ERROR RATES PER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	126
TABLE 3.15:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: ERROR RATES PER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	126
TABLE 3.16:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: ERROR RATES PER BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	127
TABLE 3.17:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: COMPLETENESS OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD	127
TABLE 3.18:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: COMPLETENESS OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	127
TABLE 3.19:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: COMPLETENESS OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	127
TABLE 3.20:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: COMPLETENESS OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	128
TABLE 3.21:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
ERROR RATES PER AUTHORITY RECORD	128
TABLE 3.22:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	ERROR RATES PER AUTHORITY RECORD, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	128
TABLE 3.23:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	ERROR RATES PER AUTHORITY RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	128
TABLE 3.24:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER AUTHORITY RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	129
TABLE 3.25:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER HOLDINGS RECORD	129
TABLE 3.26:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER HOLDINGS RECORD, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	129
TABLE 3.27:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER HOLDINGS RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	129
TABLE 3.28:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	ERROR RATES PER HOLDINGS RECORD, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	130
TABLE 3.29:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	ERROR RATES PER PHYSICAL PROCESSING	130
TABLE 3.30:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	130
TABLE 3.31:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK:
	ERROR RATES PER PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	130
TABLE 3.32:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	ERROR RATES PER PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	131
TABLE 3.33:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMPLAINTS	131
TABLE 3.34:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMPLAINTS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	131
TABLE 3.35:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMPLAINTS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	131
TABLE 3.36:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMPLAINTS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	132
TABLE 3.37:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMMENDATION	132
TABLE 3.38:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMMENDATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	132
TABLE 3.39:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMMENDATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	132
TABLE 3.40:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	PATRON OR STAFF COMMENDATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	133
TABLE 3.41:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	SUPPORT OR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL OR LIBRARY GOAL	133
TABLE 3.42:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	SUPPORT OR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL OR LIBRARY GOAL, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	133
TABLE 3.43:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	SUPPORT OR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL OR LIBRARY GOAL, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	133
TABLE 3.44:	RANK OF THE FOLLOWING QUALITY INDICATOR IN CATALOGING WORK: 
	SUPPORT OR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL OR LIBRARY GOAL, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	134

TABLE 5.1:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (OBTAINING NEW AND UPDATED AUTHORITY RECORDS)	151
TABLE 5.2:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (OBTAINING NEW AND UPDATED AUTHORITY RECORDS), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	151
TABLE 5.3:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (OBTAINING NEW AND UPDATED AUTHORITY RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	151
TABLE 5.4:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (OBTAINING NEW AND UPDATED AUTHORITY RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	151
TABLE 5.5:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (UPDATING HEADINGS IN BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS)	152
TABLE 5.6:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (UPDATING HEADINGS IN BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	152
TABLE 5.7:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (UPDATING HEADINGS IN BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	152
TABLE 5.8:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE: AUTHORITY CONTROL (UPDATING HEADINGS IN BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	152
TABLE 5.9:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS (OBTAINING NEW BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS)	152
TABLE 5.10:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS (OBTAINING NEW BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	153
TABLE 5.11:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS (OBTAINING NEW BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	153
TABLE 5.12:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS (OBTAINING NEW BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	153
TABLE 5.13:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  ITEM RECORDS AND INVENTORY	153
TABLE 5.14:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  ITEM RECORDS AND INVENTORY, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	153
TABLE 5.15:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  ITEM RECORDS AND INVENTORY, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	154
TABLE 5.16:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  ITEM RECORDS AND INVENTORY, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                        154
TABLE 5.17:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BARCODING	154
TABLE 5.18:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BARCODING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	154
TABLE 5.19:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BARCODING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	155
TABLE 5.20:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  PHYSICAL PROCESSING, BARCODING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE 	155
TABLE 5.21:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES ADDED	155
TABLE 5.22:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES ADDED, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	155
TABLE 5.23:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	156
TABLE 5.24:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                        156
TABLE 5.25:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK REVIEWS ADDED	156
TABLE 5.26:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK REVIEWS ADDED, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	156
TABLE 5.27:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK REVIEWS ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	156
TABLE 5.28:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK REVIEWS ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	157
TABLE 5.29:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK JACKETS ADDED	157
TABLE 5.30:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK JACKETS ADDED, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	157
TABLE 5.31:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK JACKETS ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	157
TABLE 5.32:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING VALUE-ADDED SERVICE:  BOOK JACKETS ADDED, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	157
TABLE 5.33:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: CONTINUING RESOURCES (PRINT)	158
TABLE 5.34:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: CONTINUING RESOURCES (PRINT), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	158
TABLE 5.35:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: CONTINUING RESOURCES (PRINT), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	158
TABLE 5.36:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: CONTINUING RESOURCES (PRINT), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	158
TABLE 5.37:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-JOURNALS	158
TABLE 5.38:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-JOURNALS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	159
TABLE 5.39:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-JOURNALS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	159
TABLE 5.40:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-JOURNALS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	159
TABLE 5.41:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-BOOKS	159
TABLE 5.42:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-BOOKS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	159
TABLE 5.43:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-BOOKS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	160
TABLE 5.44:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: E-BOOKS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	160
TABLE 5.45:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: AV FORMATS	160
TABLE 5.46:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: AV FORMATS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	160
TABLE 5.47:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: AV FORMATS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	160
TABLE 5.48:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: AV FORMATS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	161
TABLE 5.49:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESOURCES FOR WHICH THE CATALOGING AGENCY HAS NO EXPERTISE	161
TABLE 5.50:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESOURCES FOR WHICH THE CATALOGING AGENCY HAS NO EXPERTISE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	161
TABLE 5.51:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESOURCES FOR WHICH THE CATALOGING AGENCY HAS NO EXPERTISE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	161
TABLE 5.52:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESOURCES FOR WHICH THE CATALOGING AGENCY HAS NO EXPERTISE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	162
TABLE 5.53:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: OTHER DIGITAL FORMATS	162
TABLE 5.54:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: OTHER DIGITAL FORMATS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES		 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...162
TABLE 5.55:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: OTHER DIGITAL FORMATS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	162
TABLE 5.56:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: OTHER DIGITAL FORMATS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	162
TABLE 5.57:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: MATERIALS IN CATALOGING BACKLOG	163
TABLE 5.58:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: MATERIALS IN CATALOGING BACKLOG, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	163
TABLE 5.59:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: MATERIALS IN CATALOGING BACKLOG, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	163
TABLE 5.60:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: MATERIALS IN CATALOGING BACKLOG, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	163
TABLE 5.61:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: ALL MATERIALS ARE OUTSOURCED	163
TABLE 5.62:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: ALL MATERIALS ARE OUTSOURCED, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	164
TABLE 5.63:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: ALL MATERIALS ARE OUTSOURCED, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	164
TABLE 5.64:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT OUTSOURCE THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING FUNCTION: ALL MATERIALS ARE OUTSOURCED, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	164
TABLE 5.65:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT DO NOT OUTSOURCE CATALOGING	164
TABLE 5.66:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT DO NOT OUTSOURCE CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	164
TABLE 5.67:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT DO NOT OUTSOURCE CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	165
TABLE 5.68:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT DO NOT OUTSOURCE CATALOGING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	165
TABLE 5.69:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: MARCEDIT OR OTHER MARC EDITOR TO PREVIEW RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS PRIOR TO LOADING	170
TABLE 5.70:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: MARCEDIT OR OTHER MARC EDITOR TO PREVIEW RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS PRIOR TO LOADING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	170
TABLE 5.71:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: MARCEDIT OR OTHER MARC EDITOR TO PREVIEW RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS PRIOR TO LOADING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	171
TABLE 5.72:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: MARCEDIT OR OTHER MARC EDITOR TO PREVIEW RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS PRIOR TO LOADING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	171
TABLE 5.73:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: LOCAL INTEGRATED SYSTEM TO REVIEW LOADED RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS	171
TABLE 5.74:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: LOCAL INTEGRATED SYSTEM TO REVIEW LOADED RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	171
TABLE 5.75:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: LOCAL INTEGRATED SYSTEM TO REVIEW LOADED RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	172
TABLE 5.76:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: LOCAL INTEGRATED SYSTEM TO REVIEW LOADED RECORDS AND GLOBALLY EDIT TO LOCAL STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	172
TABLE 5.77:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: SPOT CHECK VENDOR RECORDS, WHENEVER COMPLETE REVIEW ISN’T POSSIBLE	 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...172
TABLE 5.78:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: SPOT CHECK VENDOR RECORDS, WHENEVER COMPLETE REVIEW ISN’T POSSIBLE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	172
TABLE 5.79:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: SPOT CHECK VENDOR RECORDS, WHENEVER COMPLETE REVIEW ISN’T POSSIBLE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	173
TABLE 5.80:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: SPOT CHECK VENDOR RECORDS, WHENEVER COMPLETE REVIEW ISN’T POSSIBLE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	173
TABLE 5.81:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: ALWAYS SPOT CHECK ALL VENDOR RECORDS	173
TABLE 5.82:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: ALWAYS SPOT CHECK ALL VENDOR RECORDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	173
TABLE 5.83:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: ALWAYS SPOT CHECK ALL VENDOR RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	173
TABLE 5.84:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: ALWAYS SPOT CHECK ALL VENDOR RECORDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	………                                                                                                                                            174
TABLE 5.85:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: NO OR MINIMAL REVIEW PERFORMED	174
TABLE 5.86:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: NO OR MINIMAL REVIEW PERFORMED, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	174
TABLE 5.87:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: NO OR MINIMAL REVIEW PERFORMED, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	174
TABLE 5.88:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT USE THE FOLLOWING QUALITY CONTROL METHOD: NO OR MINIMAL REVIEW PERFORMED, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	174

TABLE 6.1:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  MOUG (MUSIC ONLINE USERS GROUP) CONFERENCE	175
TABLE 6.2:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  MOUG (MUSIC ONLINE USERS GROUP) CONFERENCE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	175
TABLE 6.3:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  MOUG (MUSIC ONLINE USERS GROUP) CONFERENCE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	175
TABLE 6.4:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  MOUG (MUSIC ONLINE USERS GROUP) CONFERENCE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	175
TABLE 6.5:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:   PLA (PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION)	176
TABLE 6.6:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  PLA (PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	176
TABLE 6.7:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  PLA (PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	176
TABLE 6.8:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  PLA (PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                             ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..176
TABLE 6.9:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  BCR (BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH) TRAINING	176
TABLE 6.10:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  BCR (BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	177
TABLE 6.11:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  BCR (BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	177
TABLE 6.12:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  BCR (BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	177
TABLE 6.13:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  DUBLIN CORE METADATA INITIATIVE	177
TABLE 6.14:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY:  DUBLIN CORE METADATA INITIATIVE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	178
TABLE 6.15:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: DUBLIN CORE METADATA INITIATIVE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	178
TABLE 6.16:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: DUBLIN CORE METADATA INITIATIVE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	178
TABLE 6.17:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: AMIGOS LIBRARY SERVICES TRAINING	178
TABLE 6.18:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: AMIGOS LIBRARY SERVICES TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	178
TABLE 6.19:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: AMIGOS LIBRARY SERVICES TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	179
TABLE 6.20:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: AMIGOS LIBRARY SERVICES TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	179
TABLE 6.21:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: ILLINET/OCLC SERVICES (ILLINOIS LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK) TRAINING	179
TABLE 6.22:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: ILLINET/OCLC SERVICES (ILLINOIS LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	179
TABLE 6.23:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: ILLINET/OCLC SERVICES (ILLINOIS LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	180
TABLE 6.24:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: ILLINET/OCLC SERVICES (ILLINOIS LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	180
TABLE 6.25:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: INCOLSA (INDIANA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES AUTHORITY) TRAINING	180
TABLE 6.26:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: INCOLSA (INDIANA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES AUTHORITY) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	180
TABLE 6.27:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: INCOLSA (INDIANA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES AUTHORITY) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	181
TABLE 6.28:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: INCOLSA (INDIANA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES AUTHORITY) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	181
TABLE 6.29:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MINITEX LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK TRAINING	181
TABLE 6.30:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MINITEX LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	181
TABLE 6.31:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MINITEX LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	182
TABLE 6.32:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MINITEX LIBRARY INFORMATION NETWORK TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	182
TABLE 6.33:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLNC (MISSOURI LIBRARY NETWORK CORPORATION) TRAINING	182
TABLE 6.34:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLNC (MISSOURI LIBRARY NETWORK CORPORATION) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES
TABLE 6.35:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLNC (MISSOURI LIBRARY NETWORK CORPORATION) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	183
TABLE 6.36:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLNC (MISSOURI LIBRARY NETWORK CORPORATION) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	183
TABLE 6.37:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLC (MICHIGAN LIBRARY CONSORTIUM) TRAINING	183
TABLE 6.38:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLC (MICHIGAN LIBRARY CONSORTIUM) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	183
TABLE 6.39:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLC (MICHIGAN LIBRARY CONSORTIUM) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	184
TABLE 6.40:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MLC (MICHIGAN LIBRARY CONSORTIUM) TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	184
TABLE 6.41:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY, NELINET TRAINING	184
TABLE 6.42:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NELINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	184
TABLE 6.43:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NELINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	185
TABLE 6.44:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NELINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	185
TABLE 6.45:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MARC OF QUALITY	185
TABLE 6.46:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MARC OF QUALITY, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	185
TABLE 6.47:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MARC OF QUALITY, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	186
TABLE 6.48:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: MARC OF QUALITY, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	186
TABLE 6.49:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: PALINET TRAINING	186
TABLE 6.50:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: PALINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	186
TABLE 6.51:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: PALINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	187
TABLE 6.52:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: PALINET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	187
TABLE 6.53:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OHIONET TRAINING	187
TABLE 6.54:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OHIONET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	187
TABLE 6.55:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OHIONET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	188
TABLE 6.56:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OHIONET TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	188
TABLE 6.57:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: METADATA FOR YOU & ME	188
TABLE 6.58:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: METADATA FOR YOU & ME, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	188
TABLE 6.59:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: METADATA FOR YOU & ME, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	189
TABLE 6.60:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: METADATA FOR YOU & ME, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	189
TABLE 6.61:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CONFERENCES OR CONTINUING ED FROM STATE LIBRARIES	189
TABLE 6.62:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CONFERENCES OR CONTINUING ED FROM STATE LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	189
TABLE 6.63:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CONFERENCES OR CONTINUING ED FROM STATE LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	190
TABLE 6.64:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CONFERENCES OR CONTINUING ED FROM STATE LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	190
TABLE 6.65:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: STATE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS	190
TABLE 6.66:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: STATE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	190
TABLE 6.67:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: STATE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	                ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...191
TABLE 6.68:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: STATE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	…………………………………………………………………………………………………..191
TABLE 6.69:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC EASTERN TRAINING	191
TABLE 6.70:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC EASTERN TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	191
TABLE 6.71:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC EASTERN TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	192
TABLE 6.72:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC EASTERN TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	192
TABLE 6.73:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: RBMS (RARE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS CATALOGING) OF ACRL	192
TABLE 6.74:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: RBMS (RARE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS CATALOGING) OF ACRL, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	192
TABLE 6.75:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: RBMS (RARE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS CATALOGING) OF ACRL, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	193
TABLE 6.76:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: RBMS (RARE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS CATALOGING) OF ACRL, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	193
TABLE 6.77:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC WESTERN SERVICE CENTER TRAINING	193
TABLE 6.78:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC WESTERN SERVICE CENTER TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	193
TABLE 6.79:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC WESTERN SERVICE CENTER TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	194
TABLE 6.80:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: OCLC WESTERN SERVICE CENTER TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………194
TABLE 6.81:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: SCCTP (SERIALS CATALOGING COOPERATIVE TRAINING PROGRAM)	194
TABLE 6.82:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: SCCTP (SERIALS CATALOGING COOPERATIVE TRAINING PROGRAM), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	194
TABLE 6.83:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: SCCTP (SERIALS CATALOGING COOPERATIVE TRAINING PROGRAM), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	195
TABLE 6.84:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: SCCTP (SERIALS CATALOGING COOPERATIVE TRAINING PROGRAM), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	195
TABLE 6.85:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CCT (COOPERATIVE CATALOGING TRAINING) OF ALCTS AND PROGRAM FOR COOPERATIVE CATALOGING (PCC)	195
TABLE 6.86:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CCT (COOPERATIVE CATALOGING TRAINING) OF ALCTS AND PROGRAM FOR COOPERATIVE CATALOGING (PCC), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	195
TABLE 6.87:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CCT (COOPERATIVE CATALOGING TRAINING) OF ALCTS AND PROGRAM FOR COOPERATIVE CATALOGING (PCC), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	196
TABLE 6.88:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CCT (COOPERATIVE CATALOGING TRAINING) OF ALCTS AND PROGRAM FOR COOPERATIVE CATALOGING (PCC), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	196
TABLE 6.89:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NISO (NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION)	196
TABLE 6.90:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NISO (NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	196
TABLE 6.91:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NISO (NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	197
TABLE 6.92:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: NISO (NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	197
TABLE 6.93:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CATALOGING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (CAT21, OF ALCTS AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS)	197
TABLE 6.94:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CATALOGING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (CAT21, OF ALCTS AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	197
TABLE 6.95:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CATALOGING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (CAT21, OF ALCTS AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	198
TABLE 6.96:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: CATALOGING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (CAT21, OF ALCTS AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	198
TABLE 6.97:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: WILS (WISCONSIN LIBRARY SERVICES) TRAINING	198
TABLE 6.98:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS, CATALOGING SECTION	…………………………………………………………………………………………………198
TABLE 6.99:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS, CATALOGING SECTION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	199
TABLE 6.100:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS, CATALOGING SECTION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	199
TABLE 6.101:	PERCENTAGE OF LIBRARIES THAT ATTENDED OR USED FOR TRAINING THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING/METADATA-RELATED CONFERENCE OR CONTINUING EDUCATION ENTITY: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS, CATALOGING SECTION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	199
TABLE 6.102:	OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA	199
TABLE 6.103:	OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	200
TABLE 6.104:	OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	200
TABLE 6.105:	OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	200
TABLE 6.106:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EASE OF IDENTIFYING OR FINDING PERTINENT TRAINING EVENTS	200
TABLE 6.107:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EASE OF IDENTIFYING OR FINDING PERTINENT TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	201
TABLE 6.108:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EASE OF IDENTIFYING OR FINDING PERTINENT TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	201
TABLE 6.109:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EASE OF IDENTIFYING OR FINDING PERTINENT TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                  201
TABLE 6.110:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: AVAILABILITY OF TRAINING DATES	201
TABLE 6.111:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: AVAILABILITY OF TRAINING DATES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	202
TABLE 6.112:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: AVAILABILITY OF TRAINING DATES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	202
TABLE 6.113:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: USEFULNESS OF CONTENT	202
TABLE 6.114:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: USEFULNESS OF CONTENT, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	203
TABLE 6.115:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: USEFULNESS OF CONTENT, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	203
TABLE 6.116:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: USEFULNESS OF CONTENT, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	203
TABLE 6.117:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: ORGANIZATION OF CURRICULUM	203
TABLE 6.118:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: ORGANIZATION OF CURRICULUM, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	204
TABLE 6.119:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: ORGANIZATION OF CURRICULUM, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	204
TABLE 6.120:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: ORGANIZATION OF CURRICULUM, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	204
TABLE 6.121:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: HANDOUTS AND ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS	204
TABLE 6.122:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: HANDOUTS AND ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	205
TABLE 6.123:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: HANDOUTS AND ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	205
TABLE 6.124:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: HANDOUTS AND ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	205
TABLE 6.125:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COST CONSIDERATIONS: REGISTRATION FEES	205
TABLE 6.126:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COST CONSIDERATIONS: REGISTRATION FEES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	………………………………………………………………………………………………...206
TABLE 6.127:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COST CONSIDERATIONS: REGISTRATION FEES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	206
TABLE 6.128:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COST CONSIDERATIONS: REGISTRATION FEES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	206
TABLE 6.129:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: REGION OR LOCATION OF TRAINING	206
TABLE 6.130:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: REGION OR LOCATION OF TRAINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	207
TABLE 6.131:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: REGION OR LOCATION OF TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	207
TABLE 6.132:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: REGION OR LOCATION OF TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	207
TABLE 6.133:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS	207
TABLE 6.134:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	………………………………………………………………………………………………..208
TABLE 6.135:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	208
TABLE 6.136:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	208
TABLE 6.137:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EXPERTISE OF TRAINERS	                                                                                                                                                   208
TABLE 6.138:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EXPERTISE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	209
TABLE 6.139:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EXPERTISE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	209
TABLE 6.140:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: EXPERTISE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	209
TABLE 6.141:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: PERFORMANCE OF TRAINERS	209
TABLE 6.142:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: PERFORMANCE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	210
TABLE 6.143:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: PERFORMANCE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	210
TABLE 6.144:	ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: PERFORMANCE OF TRAINERS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	210

TABLE 7.1:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS	                                                                                                                         …………………219
TABLE 7.2:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	219
TABLE 7.3:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	219
TABLE 7.4:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	219
TABLE 7.5:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SUBJECT/GENRE THESAURI SYSTEMS	220
TABLE 7.6:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SUBJECT/GENRE THESAURI SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	220
TABLE 7.7:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SUBJECT/GENRE THESAURI SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	220
TABLE 7.8:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SUBJECT/GENRE THESAURI SYSTEMS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	220
TABLE 7.9:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION AND SUBJECT/GENRE ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES, RULES AND TOOLS	221
TABLE 7.10:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION AND SUBJECT/GENRE ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES, RULES AND TOOLS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	221
TABLE 7.11:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION AND SUBJECT/GENRE ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES, RULES AND TOOLS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	221
TABLE 7.12:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CLASSIFICATION AND SUBJECT/GENRE ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES, RULES AND TOOLS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                              ………………………….221
TABLE 7.13:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: JAVA AND PERL SCRIPT APPLICATIONS	222
TABLE 7.14:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: JAVA AND PERL SCRIPT APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	222
TABLE 7.15:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: JAVA AND PERL SCRIPT APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	222
TABLE 7.16:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: JAVA AND PERL SCRIPT APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	222
TABLE 7.17:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING RULES AND TOOLS (INCLUDING DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING)	223
TABLE 7.18:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING RULES AND TOOLS (INCLUDING DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	223
TABLE 7.19:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING RULES AND TOOLS (INCLUDING DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	223
TABLE 7.20:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING RULES AND TOOLS (INCLUDING DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………223
TABLE 7.21:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT	224
TABLE 7.22:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	224
TABLE 7.23:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	224
TABLE 7.24:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	224
TABLE 7.25:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: METADATA STANDARDS FOR DIGITAL RESOURCES (DUBLIN CORE, MODS, VRA, OPEN ARCHIVES INITIATIVE, ETC.)	225
TABLE 7.26:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: METADATA STANDARDS FOR DIGITAL RESOURCES (DUBLIN CORE, MODS, VRA, OPEN ARCHIVES INITIATIVE, ETC.), BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	225
TABLE 7.27:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: METADATA STANDARDS FOR DIGITAL RESOURCES (DUBLIN CORE, MODS, VRA, OPEN ARCHIVES INITIATIVE, ETC.), BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	225
TABLE 7.28:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: METADATA STANDARDS FOR DIGITAL RESOURCES (DUBLIN CORE, MODS, VRA, OPEN ARCHIVES INITIATIVE, ETC.), BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	225
TABLE 7.29:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING	226
TABLE 7.30:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	226
TABLE 7.31:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	226
TABLE 7.32:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	226
TABLE 7.33:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF SERVICES	227
TABLE 7.34:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF SERVICES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	227
TABLE 7.35:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF SERVICES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	227
TABLE 7.36:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF SERVICES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	227
TABLE 7.37:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: TECHNICAL SERVICES IN LIBRARIES	228
TABLE 7.38:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: TECHNICAL SERVICES IN LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	228
TABLE 7.39:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: TECHNICAL SERVICES IN LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	228
TABLE 7.40:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: TECHNICAL SERVICES IN LIBRARIES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	228
TABLE 7.41:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB AND LOCAL NETWORK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT	229
TABLE 7.42:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB AND LOCAL NETWORK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	229
TABLE 7.43:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB AND LOCAL NETWORK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	229
TABLE 7.44:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB AND LOCAL NETWORK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                                                                                                                                        230
TABLE 7.45:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: BOOKS	230
TABLE 7.46:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: BOOKS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	230
TABLE 7.47:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: BOOKS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	230
TABLE 7.48:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: BOOKS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	231
TABLE 7.49:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: NON BOOKS, DIGITAL RESOURCES	231
TABLE 7.50:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: NON BOOKS, DIGITAL RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	231
TABLE 7.51:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: NON BOOKS, DIGITAL RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	231
TABLE 7.52:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: NON BOOKS, DIGITAL RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	232
TABLE 7.53:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: CONTINUING AND INTEGRATING RESOURCES	232
TABLE 7.54:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: CONTINUING AND INTEGRATING RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	232
TABLE 7.55:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: CONTINUING AND INTEGRATING RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	232
TABLE 7.56:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING FORMATS: CONTINUING AND INTEGRATING RESOURCES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	                                    ……………………………………………………………………………233
TABLE 7.57:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: LAW	233
TABLE 7.58:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: LAW, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	233
TABLE 7.59:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: LAW, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	233
TABLE 7.60:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: LAW, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	234
TABLE 7.61:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: MUSIC	234
TABLE 7.62:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: MUSIC, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	234
TABLE 7.63:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: MUSIC, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	234
TABLE 7.64:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: MUSIC, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	235
TABLE 7.65:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: ARCHIVES AND RARE MATERIALS	235
TABLE 7.66:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: ARCHIVES AND RARE MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	235
TABLE 7.67:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: ARCHIVES AND RARE MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	235
TABLE 7.68:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: CATALOGING SPECIAL MATERIALS: ARCHIVES AND RARE MATERIALS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………236
TABLE 7.69:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: XML AND/OR XSLT	……………………………………………………………………………………………………236
TABLE 7.70:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: XML AND/OR XSLT, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	236
TABLE 7.71:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: XML AND/OR XSLT, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	236
TABLE 7.72:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: XML AND/OR XSLT, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	237
TABLE 7.73:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ECONOMICS AND METRICS OF INFORMATION	237
TABLE 7.74:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ECONOMICS AND METRICS OF INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	237
TABLE 7.75:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ECONOMICS AND METRICS OF INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	237
TABLE 7.76:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ECONOMICS AND METRICS OF INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	238
TABLE 7.77:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DISCOVERY TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS	238
TABLE 7.78:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DISCOVERY TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	238
TABLE 7.79:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DISCOVERY TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	238
TABLE 7.80:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DISCOVERY TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	239
TABLE 7.81:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: AUTHORITY CONTROL……………	239
TABLE 7.82:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: AUTHORITY CONTROL, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	239
TABLE 7.83:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: AUTHORITY CONTROL, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	239
TABLE 7.84:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: AUTHORITY CONTROL, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	240
TABLE 7.85:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB USABILITY, USER RESEARCH AND HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN	240
TABLE 7.86:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB USABILITY, USER RESEARCH AND HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	240
TABLE 7.87:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB USABILITY, USER RESEARCH AND HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	240
TABLE 7.88:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: WEB USABILITY, USER RESEARCH AND HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	241
TABLE 7.89:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INTERNATIONAL MARC BIBLIOGRAPHIC, AUTHORITY AND HOLDINGS STANDARDS	241
TABLE 7.90:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INTERNATIONAL MARC BIBLIOGRAPHIC, AUTHORITY AND HOLDINGS STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	241
TABLE 7.91:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INTERNATIONAL MARC BIBLIOGRAPHIC, AUTHORITY AND HOLDINGS STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	242
TABLE 7.92:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INTERNATIONAL MARC BIBLIOGRAPHIC, AUTHORITY AND HOLDINGS STANDARDS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	……………………………………………………………………………………………………242
TABLE 7.93:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DATA MODELING, WAREHOUSING, MINING	242
TABLE 7.94:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DATA MODELING, WAREHOUSING, MINING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	242
TABLE 7.95:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DATA MODELING, WAREHOUSING, MINING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	243
TABLE 7.96:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DATA MODELING, WAREHOUSING, MINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	243
TABLE 7.97:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS	243
TABLE 7.98:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	243
TABLE 7.99:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	244
TABLE 7.100:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	244
TABLE 7.101:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS	244
TABLE 7.102:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	245
TABLE 7.103:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	245
TABLE 7.104:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	245
TABLE 7.105:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: RELATIONAL DATABASE DESIGN	246
TABLE 7.106:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: RELATIONAL DATABASE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	246
TABLE 7.107:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: RELATIONAL DATABASE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	246
TABLE 7.108:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: RELATIONAL DATABASE DESIGN, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	246
TABLE 7.109:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: OCLC SYSTEMS AND SERVICES	247
TABLE 7.110:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: OCLC SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	247
TABLE 7.111:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: OCLC SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	247
TABLE 7.112:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: OCLC SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	247
TABLE 7.113:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DIGITAL LIBRARIES AND COLLECTIONS	248
TABLE 7.114:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DIGITAL LIBRARIES AND COLLECTIONS, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	248
TABLE 7.115:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DIGITAL LIBRARIES AND COLLECTIONS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	248
TABLE 7.116:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: DIGITAL LIBRARIES AND COLLECTIONS, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	248
TABLE 7.117:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRACTICUM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING	249
TABLE 7.118:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRACTICUM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	249
TABLE 7.119:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRACTICUM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	249
TABLE 7.120:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRACTICUM: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	249
TABLE 7.121:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES:	250
INFORMATION STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, ARCHITECTURE	250
TABLE 7.122:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES:	250
INFORMATION STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, ARCHITECTURE, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	250
TABLE 7.123:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES:	250
INFORMATION STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, ARCHITECTURE, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	250
TABLE 7.124:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES:	250
INFORMATION STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, ARCHITECTURE, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	250
TABLE 7.125:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SOCIAL NETWORKING AND INFORMATION	251
TABLE 7.126:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SOCIAL NETWORKING AND INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	251
TABLE 7.127:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SOCIAL NETWORKING AND INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	251
TABLE 7.128:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: SOCIAL NETWORKING AND INFORMATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	251
TABLE 7.129:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION	252
TABLE 7.130:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	………………………………………………………………………………………………..252
TABLE 7.131:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	252
TABLE 7.132:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	252
TABLE 7.133:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRINCIPLES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL	253
TABLE 7.134:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRINCIPLES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL, BROKEN OUT FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES	253
TABLE 7.135:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRINCIPLES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE	253
TABLE 7.136:	RATING OF PREPAREDNESS BY LIBRARIES IN THE SAMPLE OF RECENT LIBRARY HIRES IN THE FOLLOWING CATALOGING AND METADATA COMPETENCIES: PRINCIPLES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE	………………………………………………………………………………………………...253
 

Back

© Primary Research Group